GuidelineActa orthopaedica2026
Update of guideline for diagnosis and treatment of subacromial pain syndrome: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopedic Association Part 1: preventive measures, diagnostics, and non-surgical treatment of subacromial pain syndrome.
Guideline in Acta orthopaedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical practice on treatment of primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a multidisciplinary guideline.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Guideline
- Guideline
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeIn 2013, the first clinical practice guideline for subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) was developed in the Netherlands to support healthcare professionals. SAPS refers to non-traumatic, non-rheumatologic shoulder complaints that are particularly painful during arm elevation. It includes conditions such as supraspinatus tendinosis, calcific tendinitis, and degenerative supraspinatus tears. Over 50,000 patients annually consult orthopedic surgeons for these issues. In response to new evidence and clinical needs, an updated guideline was developed. Part 1 addresses prevention, diagnosis, imaging, and non-surgical treatment. Using a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach, the guideline aims to answer key clinical questions around SAPS.
methodsInitiated by the Dutch Orthopedic Society, the guideline committee identified knowledge gaps through group sessions. Each module was based on a PICO-formatted key question and reviewed by professionals from different fields. The AGREE and GRADE methods were applied to ensure a systematic evaluation of evidence, leading to conclusions and recommendations.
results(i) Inform patients about the potential positive effects of a healthy lifestyle and encourage gradual exercise within sport and work. (ii) Perform a cluster of physical diagnostic tests to diagnose SAPS. (iii) Perform ultrasonography in patients with clinical suspicion of (partial thickness) rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. Consider MRI if ultrasound is not available or inconclusive. (iv) Consider barbotage for symptomatic calcific tendinosis, preferably with corticosteroid injection in the bursa, if a previous corticosteroid injection was ineffective. (v) Consider a subacromial corticosteroid injection (with a local anesthetic) to enable exercise therapy in patients with severe complaints that impair their ability to participate in exercise therapy. (vi) Consider suprascapular nerve block for patients with therapy-resistant SAPS when other non-surgical treatment is ineffective.
conclusionThe updated guideline provides multidisciplinary recommendations for physical examination, imaging, and conservative management of SAPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.