Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718537›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2026

Refining a Novel Measure of Polysubstance Use: Applying the Cognitive Interview Method with People Who Use Drugs.

Amanda M Bunting, Brittany Griffin, Adam Rubens, Daniel Lima, Victoria Lam, Matheus Bender, Adetayo Fawole, Jennifer McNeely, Charles M Cleland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amanda M BuntingDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2103-9655
Brittany GriffinDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Adam RubensResearch Software Engineering Core, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel LimaResearch Software Engineering Core, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Victoria LamPerlmutter Cancer Center Data Hub, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Matheus BenderDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Adetayo FawoleDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer McNeelyDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Charles M ClelandDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
Development of a novel polysubstance assessment tool for vulnerable subpopulationsK01DA053435 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BUNTING, AMANDA M · 2021 to 2025
$909k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA053435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive interviewing is a methodological technique to elicit feedback on item comprehension and response categories by the target population. This method can be particularly relevant when working with vulnerable populations, such as people who use drugs, and for complex behaviors, including the use of multiple drugs (i.e., polysubstance use). While cognitive interviewing is recognized as an important technique, few case studies of the method have been published.

objectiveThe current manuscript details the cognitive interview method employed as part of the development of a novel polysubstance assessment tool.

resultsParticipants (n=28) with recent polysubstance use provided qualitative feedback using an iterative study design. Results detail the decision-making process of the study team to improve comprehension of complex behaviors, specifically simultaneous and same-day polysubstance use. Notably, the administration modality changed from self to interviewer-administered to facilitate participant understanding.

conclusionsFindings highlight the utility of the cognitive interview method in improving assessments of substance use.

Indexed as

CognitionInterview, PsychologicalSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCognitive interviewinstrument developmentpolysubstance useresearch methodssubstance use

Identifiers

PMID41718537
PMCPMC13011491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.