ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2026
Impact of Annotation Level on Multisequence MRI Models for Preoperative Microvascular Invasion Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the performance of deep learning models integrating multimodal data for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma and to investigate the impact of different manual annotation methods on performance. Materials and Methods Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma from three institutions were included in this retrospective study; postoperative histopathology served as the reference standard for MVI. Patients from center A were divided into training and internal test sets; patients from centers B and C formed the external test set. Two manual annotations (voxel-level masks, bounding boxes) were performed on MRI scans. Deep learning models were developed using multimodal data. Model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic, calibration, and decision curve analysis, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) differences tested by the DeLong test. Results A total of 281 patients were included in this study (mean age, 59.05 years ± 11.92 [SD]; 238 male). Single-sequence models achieved internal test AUCs of 0.57-0.76. Multisequence models reached AUCs of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.95) with masks and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.94) with bounding boxes. Multimodal fusion improved performance (mask: AUC, 0.88 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.96] vs bounding box: AUC, 0.85 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.94];
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.