ArticlePediatric reports2026
Critical Intestinal Perforations in Pediatric Immunocompromised Patients: A Case-Based Review.
Article in Pediatric reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As survival rates for children with cancer and immune disorders have improved, clinical focus has shifted toward managing serious treatment-related complications. Intestinal perforation remains life-threatening and is typically diagnosed by signs of peritonitis and inflammation. This report presents three high-risk pediatric patients who developed severe intestinal perforation without the usual clinical symptoms. Each patient was receiving high-dose corticosteroids and/or targeted biologic immunomodulators (ruxolitinib, anakinra, tocilizumab, eculizumab). Classic indicators such as fever, leukocytosis, hemodynamic instability, and abdominal pain were absent, despite surgical findings of fecal contamination and bowel necrosis. All three patients survived to hospital discharge. These cases demonstrate that potent immunomodulatory therapies can mask the physiological response to perforation. Relying solely on traditional clinical signs may delay diagnosis. In this population, subtle findings such as persistent gastrointestinal bleeding, feeding intolerance, or minor imaging abnormalities should prompt consideration of perforation. Early imaging and multidisciplinary review are essential for timely intervention and improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.