ReviewJournal of eye movement research2026
Mapping Eye-Tracking Research in Human-Computer Interaction: A Science-Mapping and Content-Analysis Study.
Review in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye-Tracking Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Review
- Uncertainty-Aware General Gaze Following via Circular Direction Distribution Learning and Probabilistic Gaze Geometry Modeling.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- On the Use and Application of Virtual Reality in Diagnostic Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye tracking has become a central method in human-computer interaction (HCI), supported by advances in sensing technologies and AI-based gaze analysis. Despite this rapid growth, a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of eye-tracking research across the broader HCI landscape remains lacking. This study combines records from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus to analyse 1033 publications on eye tracking in HCI published between 2020 and 2025. After merging and deduplicating the datasets, we conducted bibliometric network analyses (keyword co-occurrence, co-citation, co-authorship, and source mapping) using VOSviewer and performed a qualitative content analysis of the 50 most-cited papers. The literature is dominated by journal articles and conference papers produced by small- to medium-sized research teams (mean: 3.9 authors per paper; h-index: 29). Keyword and overlay visualisations reveal four principal research axes: deep-learning-based gaze estimation; XR-related interaction paradigms within HCI; cognitive load and human factors; and usability- and accessibility-oriented interface design. The most-cited studies focus on gaze interaction in immersive environments, deep learning for gaze estimation, multimodal interaction, and physiological approaches to assessing cognitive load. Overall, the findings indicate that eye tracking in HCI is evolving from a measurement-oriented technique into a core enabling technology that supports interaction design, cognitive assessment, accessibility, and ethical considerations such as privacy. This review identifies research gaps and outlines future directions for benchmarking practices, real-world deployments, and privacy-preserving gaze analytics in HCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.