Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718377›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2026

Eye Movement Classification Using Neuromorphic Vision Sensors.

Khadija Iddrisu, Waseem Shariff, Maciej Stec, Noel O'Connor, Suzanne Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khadija IddrisuFaculty of Engineering and Computing, Dublin City University, D09DXA0 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0004-0008-5697
Waseem ShariffC3I Imaging Lab, School of Engineering, University of Galway, H91TK33 Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7298-9389
Maciej StecC3I Imaging Lab, School of Engineering, University of Galway, H91TK33 Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0002-7355-3899
Noel O'ConnorFaculty of Engineering and Computing, Dublin City University, D09DXA0 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4033-9135
Suzanne LittleFaculty of Engineering and Computing, Dublin City University, D09DXA0 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3281-3471

Funding

Taighde Éireann - Research Ireland 12/RC/2289\_P2Tobii (Sweden) 00000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye movement classification, particularly the identification of fixations and saccades, plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of neurological functions and cognitive processing. Conventional modalities of data, such as RGB webcams, often face limitations such as motion blur, latency and susceptibility to noise. Neuromorphic Vision Sensors, also known as event cameras (ECs), capture pixel-level changes asynchronously and at a high temporal resolution, making them well suited for detecting the swift transitions inherent to eye movements. However, the resulting data are sparse, which makes them less well suited for use with conventional algorithms. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are gaining attention due to their discrete spatio-temporal spike mechanism ideally suited for sparse data. These networks offer a biologically inspired computational paradigm capable of modeling the temporal dynamics captured by event cameras. This study validates the use of Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) with event cameras for efficient eye movement classification. We manually annotated the EV-Eye dataset, the largest publicly available event-based eye-tracking benchmark, into sequences of saccades and fixations, and we propose a convolutional SNN architecture operating directly on spike streams. Our model achieves an accuracy of 94% and a precision of 0.92 across annotated data from 10 users. As the first work to apply SNNs to eye movement classification using event data, we benchmark our approach against spiking baselines such as SpikingVGG and SpikingDenseNet, and additionally provide a detailed computational complexity comparison between SNN and ANN counterparts. Our results highlight the efficiency and robustness of SNNs for event-based vision tasks, with over one order of magnitude improvement in computational efficiency, with implications for fast and low-power neurocognitive diagnostic systems.

Indexed as

event cameraseye movementsspiking neural networks

Identifiers

PMID41718377
PMCPMC12921954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.