ArticleReports (MDPI)2026
Fractured Full-Arch Tooth-Supported Zirconia Bridge: Thin Design, Surface Damage, and Excessive Cement Layer Thickness.
Article in Reports (MDPI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zirconia is widely used in full-arch restorations due to its strength and aesthetics, but failures can still affect its performance in clinical practice. In this report, a full-arch tooth-supported zirconia bridge fractured prematurely (eleven months), encouraging an investigation into its design and failure mechanisms. STL files obtained from the dental laboratory revealed regions of reduced framework thickness, falling below the manufacturer's recommendations. Fractographic analysis of the fractured pieces indicated a multifactorial failure pattern. Notable features included a thick cement layer, surface damage likely caused by the CAM bur during milling, and occlusal wear affecting the glazed surface. Crack propagation was observed in an occlusal-to-cervical direction. While no single factor could be definitively identified as the primary cause, the failure is attributed to the combined effect of insufficient design, surface damage, and biomechanical overload. Importantly, most such factors are not visible before failure, raising questions about the proper evaluation of zirconia-based restorations prior to their cementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.