ReviewJournal of xenobiotics2026
Potential Role of Mosses in Evaluating Airborne Microplastic Deposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems.
Review in Journal of xenobiotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The deposition of airborne microplastics (MPs) poses potential risks to human health and terrestrial ecosystems. Therefore, suitable mitigation efforts are needed, as is knowledge of their deposition patterns in inhabited and remote regions. Currently, there are no standardized protocols for monitoring airborne MPs, and implementing and managing automatic monitoring systems would be costly and feasible only in a few fixed locations. Over the past few decades, several species of cryptogams have proven to be reliable biomonitors of persistent atmospheric contaminants. Due to the lack of standardized methodologies, the results of preliminary biomonitoring surveys for MPs have been inconsistent and difficult to compare. However, they clearly indicate higher MP concentrations in epigeic mosses than in epiphytic lichens (collected at the same site or experimentally exposed in parallel in bags). This review discusses the morphophysiological features that favor the entrapment and retention of intercepted MPs in mosses, as well as the field and laboratory activities necessary to determine whether these organisms progressively accumulate airborne MPs as a function of the exposure time. Steps for future research needed to develop a cost-effective, reliable and easily applicable biomonitoring methodology are suggested. Evaluating the advantages of active moss biomonitoring over sampling atmospheric bulk deposition or exposing suitable commercial materials is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.