ArticleNeuroSci2026
Effects of Incremental Mechanical Load on Readiness Potential Amplitude During Voluntary Movement.
Article in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voluntary movement arises from a sequence of neural processes that involve planning, preparation, and execution within distributed cortical networks. The readiness potential, a slow negative brain signal preceding self-initiated actions, represents a sensitive indicator of motor preparation. However, it remains unclear how this signal reflects concurrent variations in mechanical and temporal demands. In this study, twenty-eight healthy participants performed self-paced elbow flexions under nine combinations of mechanical load and movement duration while brain electrical activity, muscle activity, and movement kinematics were simultaneously recorded. Linear mixed-effects analyses revealed that the amplitude of the readiness potential increased progressively with greater mechanical load, indicating that cortical readiness scales with the intensity of preparatory effort. In contrast, longer movement durations produced smaller amplitudes, suggesting that extended temporal windows reduce the efficiency of preparatory synchronization. No significant interaction between load and duration was observed, supporting the idea of partially independent neural mechanisms for effort and timing. These findings identify the readiness potential as a neural marker integrating the energetic and temporal dimensions of voluntary movement and provide a basis for understanding how cortical readiness dynamically optimizes human motor performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.