Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718025›Full record

ArticleAdvances in skin & wound care2026

Quantifying and Visualizing the Pressure Distribution of In-Bed Positions to Reduce Pressure Injury Risk.

Tim M N van Helden, Sarah L Versnel, Lisa Arkes, Mette Lindhout, Marc A M Mureau, Johan W van Neck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in skin & wound care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tim M N van HeldenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7252-4554
Sarah L Versnel
Lisa Arkes
Mette Lindhout
Marc A M Mureau
Johan W van Neck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePressure injuries (PIs) are a major health care issue, and timely and correct repositioning of patients at risk for PIs is crucial in lowering the PI risk. However, the ideal bed positions and the impact on the PI risk are often unclear to health care staff. Therefore, the authors used a pressure-detecting mat to quantify and visualize the effects of bed settings and body position on the pressure distribution to provide insightful graphics for educating health care staff.

methodsThe authors quantitatively assessed and visualized the pressure distribution of different in-bed lying and sitting positions with a pressure-measuring mat on 2 different hospital mattresses by including healthy volunteers.

resultsDifferences between positions were visualized by the pressure mat. The median pressure on the sacrum increased by 30% to 35% when the head of bed (HOB) angle was raised from 0° to 30° and further increased 17% to 27% when the HOB angle was raised from 30° to 45°. Pressure on sacrum, when sitting with an HOB angle of 30°, reduced by 19% to 35% when raising the legs to semi-Fowler position. During lateral rotation, median pressure on the greater trochanter increased by 27% to 35% when rotating from 30° to 60°. Pressures are reported in a range between the 2 different mattresses.

conclusionsPressure maps and peak pressure values of the different bed positions can help educate nurses on how body position changes the pressure distribution and provides additional support to follow the international guideline on PI prevention.

Indexed as

BedsPatient PositioningPosturePressurePressure UlcerAdultFemaleHumansMaleRisk Assessmentbed positionmattresspressure injurypressure sensorpreventionrepositioning

Identifiers

PMID41718025
PMCPMC12893143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.