ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2026
Inflammatory indices, machine learning and artificial intelligence in tubal ectopic pregnancy management.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the predictive value of hematologic and biochemical inflammatory indices for methotrexate (MTX) treatment outcomes in tubal ectopic pregnancy (TEP) and to develop machine learning (ML) models for individualized risk stratification. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort included 293 hemodynamically stable TEP patients who were treated with a single dose of MTX between January 2019 and December 2023. Demographic, clinical, ultrasonographic, and laboratory data were analyzed. Inflammatory indices-including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR)-were calculated. Outcomes were categorized as single-dose MTX success, requirement for additional MTX, or surgery. Predictive accuracy of five supervised ML algorithms was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Single-dose MTX was successful in 65.5% of patients; 18.4% required an additional dose, and 16.0% underwent surgery. AISI had the highest predictive accuracy for surgery [area under the curve (AUC)=0.929], followed by SIRI (AUC=0.899) and FAR (AUC=0.847). NLR best predicted the need for additional MTX (AUC=0.675). Naïve Bayes achieved the highest performance for surgical prediction (accuracy=98.3%, AUC=0.998), while random forest and gradient boosting were most effective in predicting the need for additional MTX (accuracy=83.1%, AUC=0.884-0.896). Feature importance analyses consistently ranked AISI, SIRI, and FAR as top predictors. Conclusion: AISI, SIRI, and FAR are strong predictors of MTX failure and surgical intervention in TEP. Combining these biomarkers with ML models markedly improves predictive performance and supports a personalized approach to TEP management. Multicenter prospective validation is needed before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.