Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717654›Full record

ReviewGeoHealth2026

Wildfires and Public Health: A Comprehensive Review of Human-Centric Studies.

Xinyue Ye, Yuning Ye, Xiao Huang, Tracy Onega

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GeoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinyue YeDepartment of Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning Texas A&M University College Station TX USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8838-9476
Yuning YeDepartment of Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning Texas A&M University College Station TX USA.
Xiao HuangDepartment of Environmental Sciences Emory University Atlanta GA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-382X
Tracy OnegaDepartment of Population Health Sciences University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, wildfires have surged in frequency, as highlighted in the 2024 National Interagency Fire Center report, and continue to rise, making them a worldwide concern due to their environmental and public health impact. Climate change and shifting fire patterns contribute to this growing challenge. This review addresses the complex relationship between wildfires and public health, facilitating informed decision-making in response to this global challenge. Wildfires intricately affect human health, encompassing physical, psychological and social dimensions. Beyond immediate risks like respiratory issues, cardiovascular incidents, and burns, their enduring effects include prolonged exposure to poor air quality, population displacement, disrupted healthcare, psychological trauma and negative economic impacts. As research methods advance, it is vital to systematically review the existing literature to consolidate knowledge, identify gaps, and guide policies and interventions. Our review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the health consequences linked to wildfires by synthesizing findings from diverse studies. We systematically reviewed 139 peer-reviewed studies published between 1997 and 2023, retrieved from Web of Science, to synthesize evidence on wildfire exposure metrics, health impacts, and population vulnerabilities. We seek to outline the spectrum of health outcomes, explore potential impact mechanisms, and identify vulnerable populations. Additionally, we critically assess study methodologies, evaluate evidence quality, and pinpoint areas requiring further exploration.

Indexed as

human‐centric studiespublic healthsystematic reviewwildfires

Identifiers

PMID41717654
PMCPMC12914487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.