ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The Medicine for a Changing Planet curriculum: a mixed methods evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a need to more fully integrate Planetary Health and One Health principles into current medical education programs. The Medicine for a Changing Planet (MCP) curriculum is a set of online, freely available, competency-based clinical cases developed by the authors to address this gap. This study was conducted to pilot and evaluate the MCP curriculum using a mixed methods approach. Materials and methods: Residents were invited to participate in interactive didactic sessions during which the authors piloted the content of the 11 MCP cases and collected feedback. Each session included a pre-test, case delivery using one of the MCP slide sets, and a post-test. Feedback was obtained using a structured questionnaire and focus group discussions. Results: Total attendance across all didactic sessions was 87, including 57 unique participants. The median pre-test score was 67%, and the median post-test score was 83% ( Conclusion: The MCP curriculum was effective in increasing understanding and recognition of how Planetary Health and One Health approaches can improve patient care, and there was strong demand to integrate this content into medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.