Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717613›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Risk factors for adverse events following rabies vaccination: a multivariate analysis of real-world data.

Hao Xu, Wenjie Yan, Qiye Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao XuDepartment of Emergency, Ningbo Ninth Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Wenjie YanDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Ningbo Ninth Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Qiye MaDepartment of Emergency, Ningbo Ninth Hospital, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate independent risk and protective factors associated with adverse reactions following rabies vaccination in a Chinese population; to develop and validate a predictive nomogram for clinical utility; to support risk stratification management in clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 806 patients who visited the Animal Bite Outpatient Clinic of Ningbo Ninth Hospital between September 2023 and August 2025. Variables were screened using LASSO regression, and a multivariate logistic regression-based nomogram model was constructed. The model's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and ten-fold cross-validation. Results: This study identified high-risk exposure grade (OR = 1.37), bilateral deltoid vaccination (OR = 4.93), history of allergy (OR = 5.07), and delayed wound management (OR = 2.13) as significant risk factors ( Conclusion: This study is the first to identify bilateral deltoid vaccination as an independent risk factor for adverse reactions to rabies vaccine. The constructed nomogram model demonstrates high accuracy in identifying high-risk individuals. Clinically, it is recommended that high-risk exposure patients receive single-site vaccination combined with a 4-dose regimen, with wound management completed within 24 h. Enhanced monitoring is advised for hypertensive patients to mitigate potential risks.

Indexed as

RabiesRabies VaccinesVaccinationAdolescentAdultAnimalsChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNomogramsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveRabies Vaccinesbilateral deltoid vaccinationnomogram prediction modelrabies vaccine adverse reactionsreal-world datarisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41717613
PMCPMC12913450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.