ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Rapid diagnosis of
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric mucosal microbiota.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Endoscopic visualization for the diagnosis of Methods: The clinical data of patients who completed gastroscopy were collected, and 16 endoscopic features were evaluated and recorded. On the basis of the status of HP infection, the patients were classified into three groups: the current HP infection group (CI), the previous HP infection group (PI), and the negative HP infection group (NI), with 1,000 patients screened in each group. In this study, an HP infection classification model based on the transformer network was constructed, which uses a self-attention mechanism to capture feature associations for the task of HP infection classification and recognition. Model interpretability was achieved by screening key features through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) value analysis. Results: A total of 3,000 subjects were included in the study, and comparative analysis revealed that the 1D-transformer model demonstrated superior performance in the HP recognition task. The accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1_scores produced by the model were 98.9 ± 0.28, 98.8 ± 0.14, 99.4 ± 0.27, and 98.9 ± 0.28, respectively. In addition, it has better performance than other algorithms and models. In terms of model interpretability, this study highlights the importance rankings of different features in model decision-making and the directions of their influence. The results show that map redness (SHAP value of 0.220), xanxoma (SHAP value of 0.101), atrophy (SHAP value of 0.065), and intestinal metaplasia (SHAP value of 0.008) are key features for identifying the PI. Diffuse redness (SHAP 0.186), thickened folds (SHAP 0.126), mucus coverage (SHAP 0.094), and nodular changes (SHAP 0.043) are key features for identifying CI. The presence of RAC (SHAP 0.262) and ridge redness (SHAP 0.026) are key features for identifying NI. Conclusion: This study applies a 1D-transformer model to the task of classifying HP infection status, and compared with other models, it can precisely screen out populations with three different HP infection statuses, with higher performance and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.