Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717590›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Psychological Safety in Surgical Training.

Xiang Yuen Po

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xiang Yuen PoGeneral Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological safety is the belief that individuals may ask questions, express doubts, and admit mistakes without fear of humiliation. It has emerged as a fundamental determinant of learning in high-stakes clinical environments. Surgical education remains historically hierarchical, often privileging endurance over vulnerability and silence over inquiry. While operative exposure and technical skill acquisition remain central to training, emerging evidence demonstrates that hierarchical and punitive workplace cultures impair error disclosure, suppress speaking-up behaviours, reduce feedback uptake, and increase cognitive load during performance, thereby limiting skill consolidation and patient safety improvement. This paper adopts a narrative review and conceptual synthesis approach, drawing on contemporary surgical, organisational, and educational literature to examine the mechanisms, barriers, and practical applications of psychological safety within surgical training. This paper argues that psychological safety is not merely a cultural aspiration but also a critical determinant of effective surgical training. The author reviews historical and contemporary models of surgical teaching, examines barriers, including hierarchy and punitive error responses, and proposes practical strategies for cultivating safe learning environments. The surgeon of the future must be developed not only through procedural volume but through mentorship that supports curiosity, reflection, and compassion. A psychologically safe surgical culture produces faster learners, safer decision-makers, and more ethically grounded clinicians.

Indexed as

clinical learning environmentfuture surgeonpsychological safetysurgical educationsurgical training programme

Identifiers

PMID41717590
PMCPMC12916176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.