Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717586›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Forecasting left ventricular systolic dysfunction in heart failure with artificial intelligence.

Teya Bergamaschi, Tiffany Yau, Payal Chandak, Abena Kyereme-Tuah, Judy Hung, Hanna Gaggin, Isaac S Kohane, Collin M Stultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Teya BergamaschiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Tiffany YauResearch Laboratory for Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Payal ChandakHarvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Abena Kyereme-TuahDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Judy HungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Hanna GagginDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Isaac S KohaneHarvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Collin M StultzDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Objective assessment of left ventricular function remains a key prognosticator that is used to guide therapeutic decisions for patients with heart failure (HF). However, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is dynamic, with worsening LVEF linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients at risk of LVEF decline would improve prognostication and enable timely therapeutic intervention. Methods: We developed a deep learning model to Predict changes in left ventricULar Systolic function from Electrocardiograms (ECG) of patients who have Heart Failure (PULSE-HF). The model integrates 12-lead ECG waveforms with a patient's history of prior LVEF measurements to calculate the likelihood that the LVEF will be less than 40% during the year after the ECG is obtained. The model is retrospectively developed and tested using data from one hospital and externally validated on retrospective cohorts from two different hospitals. The internal development data was collected between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021. The external validation datasets were collected between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021 at one hospital and between 2008 and 2019 at the other hospital. Findings: PULSE-HF demonstrates strong discriminatory ability with respect to forecasting whether the LVEF would be below 40% within the next year, achieving areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 87.5-91.4% across all three HF cohorts. Among patients with HF who have a baseline LVEF above 40%, PULSE-HF effectively identified those at risk of worsening LVEF with AUROCs of 81.6-86.3% across all three datasets. PULSE-HF's discriminatory ability remained consistently high across a range of subgroups with different comorbidities and regardless of medical therapy. Assuming an underlying prevalence of LVEF worsening of 10% per year, PULSE-HF's negative predictive values are over 97%, assuming an underlying sensitivity of 80%. Lastly, we demonstrate that a lead I version of PULSE-HF has a performance similar to the performance of the model that uses all 12 ECG leads. Interpretation: PULSE-HF robustly predicts worsening LVEF in patients who have a prior diagnosis of HF. The method provides a platform for identifying patients who are at an increased risk of worsening systolic dysfunction. Funding: This work was supported, in part, by a grant from Quanta Computers.

Indexed as

Deep learningHeart failureLVEF

Identifiers

PMID41717586
PMCPMC12914115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.