Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717583›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Multicenter evaluation of planning quality in intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.

Sara Abdollahi, Rachid Boucenna, Cécile Chatelain, Nathan Corradini, Marie Fargier-Voiron, Vincent Fave, Juan Garcia, Sarah Ghandour, Matthias Guckenberger, Käthy Haller and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Sara AbdollahiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Rachid BoucennaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hirslanden Clinique Bois-Cerf, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cécile ChatelainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radio Onkologiezentrum Biel Seeland, Biel-Bienne, Switzerland.
Nathan CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland.
Marie Fargier-VoironDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland.
Vincent FaveDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital de La Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Juan GarciaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Atrys Schweiz AG, Liestal, Switzerland.
Sarah GhandourDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais, Rennaz, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Käthy HallerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hirslonden, Zürich, Switzerland.
Martin HärtigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Claraspital AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Tanja HertelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland.
Maud JaccardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland.
Stephan KlöckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Jérôme KrayenbühlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Natacha Ruiz LópezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.
Philippe LogaritschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Peter PemlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stadtspital Zürich Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland.
Harald PetermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Olivier PisaturoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Fribourgeois, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Francesco PupilloMedical Physics Unit, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Daniel SchmidhalterDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christian TataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinique de La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sheeba ThengumpallilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hirslanden Clinique des Grangettes, Chêne-Bougeries, Switzerland.
Veronique ValletDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrick WeberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Stephanie Tanadini-LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is a standard approach for treating multiple brain metastases. However, variation in planning practices may impact treatment quality. This study assessed planning consistency and dose-volume-based outcomes across radiation oncology centers. Materials and methods: A Computed Tomography (CT) scan of an anthropomorphic phantom with structure set was distributed to participating centers. Each center created SRT plans as for a clinical case. Dose distributions were evaluated based on Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage (V Results: Twenty-four centers, using 30 treatment units, submitted plans. The V Conclusion: This interinstitutional comparison demonstrated high plan quality and adherence to critical organ constraints, despite variability in planning strategies. These findings support nationwide planning and quality assurance standards to ensure consistently high-quality SRT.

Indexed as

Brain metastasesDosimetric intercomparisonQuality assuranceStereotactic radiotherapyTreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID41717583
PMCPMC12914438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.