Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717570›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Perspectives of professionals on the perinatal period as a window of opportunity for change in women with SUD: insights from healthcare, child welfare, substance use, and child protection services.

Sarah Vandewalle, Sara Rowaert, Gilbert Lemmens, Sarah De Pauw, Wouter Vanderplasschen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah VandewalleDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sara RowaertDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Gilbert LemmensDepartment of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sarah De PauwDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wouter VanderplasschenDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The perinatal period is widely recognized as a time of profound transition and heightened vulnerability, particularly for women with substance use disorders (SUD). Adopting a strengths-based perspective, this qualitative study aims to explore how professionals across healthcare, child welfare, substance use, and child protection services in Belgium perceive this period as a window of opportunity for change in women with SUD. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 professionals, and thematic analysis identified key themes related to barriers, opportunities, and facilitators to achieve change. Results: Barriers include disconnected bodily awareness, mutual avoidance between women and professionals, limited insight and (self-) reflection on SUD and motherhood, and insufficient support across interpersonal, socioeconomic, and systemic levels. However, professionals also identified several areas that could be reinforced to unlock the period's transformative potential, reflecting a gradual shift from a deficit-oriented view toward a more strengths-based understanding of perinatal SUD. Empowerment was seen as crucial through open conversations on family planning, psychoeducation on fertility and contraception, access to appropriate contraceptives, and trauma-sensitive, body-oriented approaches that foster connection to pregnancy and the unborn child, as well as the integration of the infant mental health perspective. The perinatal period itself was considered a naturally occurring window of opportunity for change, driven by processes of identity transformation and growing maternal motivation. Professionals emphasized the importance of enhancing professional capacity, particularly in healthcare, and improving screening and referral by midwives and gynecologists. At the care system level, increased and more consistent contact with healthcare services during pregnancy was described as a contextual opportunity for timely support; however, intersectoral collaboration and integrated care were considered essential, alongside a legal prenatal framework that enables early, non-punitive interventions to support both mother and (unborn) child. Discussion: These findings underscore the need to move beyond hegemonic discourses that frame strength and deficit, mothering and substance use, or vulnerability and opportunity as binary opposites. Recognizing the ways these dimensions coexist and intersect is vital for developing responsive, relational, and ethically grounded models of perinatal care.

Indexed as

perinatal periodprofessionals’ perspectivesstrengths-basedsubstance usewindow of opportunity

Identifiers

PMID41717570
PMCPMC12914945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.