ArticleSleep medicine: X2026
Sleep quality modifies the association between nocturnal sleep, daytime napping, and mild cognitive impairment: A population-based dose-response study.
Article in Sleep medicine: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidimensional sleep health is associated with mild cognitive impairment in older adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This cross-sectional study, based on the two-process model of sleep regulation, explored the nonlinear relationships and interactions among nocturnal sleep duration, daytime napping, sleep quality, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in middle-aged and older Chinese adults. Methods: Data from 7480 participants in the 2018 wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were analyzed. Restricted cubic splines modeled dose-response relationships, and stratified logistic regression assessed subgroup variations. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical covariates. Results: The lowest odds of MCI were observed among participants reporting 6-8 h of nocturnal sleep and 30-60 min of daytime napping. Short (<6 h) and long (>8 h) sleep durations, along with prolonged napping (≥90 min), were linked to higher odds of MCI. Sleep quality modified these associations: poor sleep quality elevated the odds of MCI, especially among long sleepers (OR = 1.88 vs. 1.33 for good sleep quality). Among short sleepers (<6 h), 30-60 min naps were associated with lower odds of MCI (OR = 0.72). Conclusions: These findings indicate that, in this cross-sectional sample, 7-8 h of nocturnal sleep combined with 30-60 min of daytime napping were associated with better cognitive status, whereas long sleep with poor sleep quality was associated with higher odds of impairment. These observational associations, considered within a circadian-homeostatic framework, are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in future longitudinal and interventional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.