Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717553›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

Quality of causes of death data in Minnesota from 2011 to 2021 - A descriptive analysis of the usage and correlates of garbage codes.

Harshada Karnik, Zachary Levin, Jovin Lasway, Jonathon P Leider, Elizabeth Wrigley-Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harshada KarnikWRMA Inc, USA.
Zachary LevinBureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, USA.
Jovin LaswayDepartment of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, USA.
Jonathon P LeiderHealth Policy and Management Division, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA.
Elizabeth Wrigley-FieldDepartment of Sociology and Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cause-of-death data in Minnesota (2011-2021) to understand the usage of "garbage codes" on death certificates. Study design: We conducted a logistic regression analysis using death data from the Minnesota Vital Statistics System that compiles statistical data on all births, deaths, infant deaths, and fetal deaths in Minnesota. Methods: Death certificate data from the Minnesota Department of Health were analyzed, and garbage codes were classified using ANACONDA criteria. Logistic regression assessed associations with socioeconomic variables, considering demographic factors, county characteristics, and fixed effects. Results: Garbage codes constituted 3-4% of deaths, with variations by location, demographics, and office affiliation. Logistic regression revealed significant odds variations, notably related to age, rural residence, education, marital status, and place of death. Conclusions: The study unveiled variations in cause-of-death data reliability in Minnesota, emphasizing the prevalence of garbage codes. Enhancing cause-of-death data accuracy is pivotal for informed public health decisions and accurate death statistics to guide targeted public health interventions and mitigate health disparities.

Indexed as

Cause-of-death dataDeath certificatesGarbage codesMortality statisticsPublic health data quality

Identifiers

PMID41717553
PMCPMC12915282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.