ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Quality of causes of death data in Minnesota from 2011 to 2021 - A descriptive analysis of the usage and correlates of garbage codes.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cause-of-death data in Minnesota (2011-2021) to understand the usage of "garbage codes" on death certificates. Study design: We conducted a logistic regression analysis using death data from the Minnesota Vital Statistics System that compiles statistical data on all births, deaths, infant deaths, and fetal deaths in Minnesota. Methods: Death certificate data from the Minnesota Department of Health were analyzed, and garbage codes were classified using ANACONDA criteria. Logistic regression assessed associations with socioeconomic variables, considering demographic factors, county characteristics, and fixed effects. Results: Garbage codes constituted 3-4% of deaths, with variations by location, demographics, and office affiliation. Logistic regression revealed significant odds variations, notably related to age, rural residence, education, marital status, and place of death. Conclusions: The study unveiled variations in cause-of-death data reliability in Minnesota, emphasizing the prevalence of garbage codes. Enhancing cause-of-death data accuracy is pivotal for informed public health decisions and accurate death statistics to guide targeted public health interventions and mitigate health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.