ArticleInternational journal of clinical trials
Effectiveness of analgosedation protocol on duration of mechanical ventilation in adults with trauma: a pragmatic, cluster and randomized study.
Article in International journal of clinical trials. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05751863 (Analgesia-First Sedation in Trauma Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analgesia-First Sedation in Trauma Patients
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Sedation practices in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are still not well studied. While protocol-directed sedation (PDS) and spontaneous awakening trials (SAT) have improved outcomes in non-trauma groups, their use in trauma patients-who often experience higher pain levels, substance use, and complex injuries-is uncertain. Analgosedation, which gives priority to analgesics before sedatives, may have benefits in this group but has not been thoroughly tested in trauma ICUs. Methods: This is a 24-month, single-center, pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial with a crossover design comparing an analgosedation (+SAT) protocol to a traditional PDS+SAT protocol. Adult trauma ICU patients receiving IMV and expected to need continuous sedation for at least 48 hours are enrolled. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days at day 10 (VFD-10). Secondary outcomes include time to weaning, sedative and opioid exposure, delirium-and coma-free days, self-extubation, ICU/hospital length of stay, and mortality. Interventions are implemented throughout the ICU each month, with crossover randomization. A waiver of informed consent was granted due to the patient's incapacity and the minimal risk involved. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat principles and time-dependent Cox models to account for clinical confounders. Conclusions: This trial aims to determine whether an analgosedation strategy improves clinically meaningful outcomes in mechanically ventilated trauma ICU patients compared to a traditional sedation approach. The findings will address a critical evidence gap and inform sedation protocols tailored to trauma populations, potentially enhancing recovery and decreasing ICU workload. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05751863 Protocol version: 4.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.