Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717528›Full record

ArticleNetwork modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics2026

Comparing subset selection methods in multi-lead electrocardiogram data.

Kassidy Crockett, Autumn Langer, Tyler Cook, Emily P Hendryx Lyons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kassidy CrockettDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Central Oklahoma, 100 N. University Drive, Edmond, OK USA.
Autumn LangerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Central Oklahoma, 100 N. University Drive, Edmond, OK USA.
Tyler CookDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Central Oklahoma, 100 N. University Drive, Edmond, OK USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8616-1432
Emily P Hendryx LyonsDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Central Oklahoma, 100 N. University Drive, Edmond, OK USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9460-6278

Funding

Summarizing Cardiac Data: An Automated Approach for Identifying Representative Heartbeats in the Clinical SettingR15LM013938 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA · PI LYONS, EMILY HENDRYX · 2022 to 2022
$375k
NLM NIH HHS R15 LM013938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart health complications are often diagnosed through the presence of anomalous heartbeat morphologies in the electrocardiogram (ECG). The automated summarization of ECG data can aid clinicians in promoting a more comprehensive, time-sensitive assessment. Given that lead availability may vary in different health-monitoring settings, however, we investigate subset selection in single-lead ECG, 12-lead ECG, vectorcardiogram (VCG), and VCG magnitude representations using data from the St. Petersburg INCART 12-lead Arrhythmia Database. Subsets for each data representation are found using seven different algorithms that can be used to form CUR matrix decompositions, three of which use oversampling from reduced representations of the data. The QR-based discrete empirical interpolation method (Q-DEIM) with 12-lead data yields the highest class detection results among the non-oversampling algorithms. The extended DEIM (E-DEIM) oversampling algorithm performs the best overall with a lower-rank representation of the VCG magnitude data, offering potential computational savings along with its improved class detection. The results of this work provide insight into the summarization of different ECG representations with the goal that such summaries can in turn be used in subsequent models or presented directly to clinicians for improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiogramMultiple leadsSubset selectionTime series summarization

Identifiers

PMID41717528
PMCPMC12913273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.