ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025
Short-term results of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in female patients with myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized blinded sham-controlled study.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the Graston method, an instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) technique, on pain reduction, trigger point count (TPC), pain pressure threshold (PPT), disability, depression, and quality of life. Patients and methods: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study included 84 female patients who were divided into three groups: the Graston group (GG), the sham group (SG), and the control group (CG). In addition to exercise, IASTM was applied to GG with the Graston technique, while the IASTM device was applied to SG without any technique. The CG received exercise only. Patients were assessed before and after treatment using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), TPC, PPT, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the World Health Organization Health-Related Quality of Life-Brief Form (WHOQOL-BREF). Results: Eight patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient failed to adhere to the exercise program. Hence, data from 75 female patients (mean age: 33.8±13.2 years) were analyzed. A statistically significant improvement was detected in NRS, TPC, PPT, and NDI in all groups. The difference in NDI and BDI scores in the GG was statistically significantly higher than in the SG. A statistically significant difference was detected in the GG compared to the CG in the changes in NRS, left-sided TPC, total TPC, NDI scores, BDI scores, and WHOQL-BREF physical health subgroup scores. Conclusion: Adding IASTM treatment to exercises for treating myofascial trigger points provided additional benefits on quality of life, depression, and disability. However, IASTM treatment applied with the Graston technique and sham treatment was similarly effective on pain and the TPC. The IASTM treatment did not affect PPT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.