Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717475›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Controlled motivation and physics achievement: a serial mediation analysis through self-efficacy and learning strategies in Chinese high school students.

Xiao Li, Xue Lin, Jingxian Lin, Mengting Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiao LiWenling High School, Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Xue LinWenling High School, Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Jingxian LinWenling High School, Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Mengting YanWenling High School, Wenling, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In high-stakes examination contexts such as China's Gaokao system, students frequently experience controlled motivation characterized by external pressure and learning anxiety. While research consistently demonstrates that controlled motivation undermines academic achievement, the psychological mechanisms through which this occurs remain underspecified. This study examined whether and how controlled motivation influences physics achievement through sequential effects on self-efficacy beliefs and learning strategy use among Chinese high school students. Methods: A total of 496 s-year high school students (65.9% male; Results: The negative association between controlled motivation and physics achievement operates primarily through psychological and behavioral mechanisms rather than through direct pathways. These findings suggest that interventions targeting self-efficacy enhancement and learning strategy support may effectively buffer against the detrimental effects of external pressure in high-stakes educational contexts. This research integrates self-determination theory, social cognitive theory, and self-regulated learning theory into a unified framework for understanding motivation-achievement relationships. Conclusion: These findings suggest that interventions targeting self-efficacy enhancement and learning strategy instruction could potentially buffer against the detrimental correlates of external pressure in high-stakes educational contexts. The research contributes to theoretical understanding by demonstrating empirical support for an integrated framework combining self-determination theory, social cognitive theory, and self-regulated learning theory in explaining motivation-achievement relationships.

Indexed as

controlled motivationGaokaohigh-stakes testinglearning strategiesphysics achievementself-efficacyserial mediation

Identifiers

PMID41717475
PMCPMC12913402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.