ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2026
Carbonyl emissions from heated tobacco products.
Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe scope of this work is to determine the carbonyl emissions from five heated tobacco products (HTPs) and the existence of differences in the emissions based on the brand, on the stick (having a different flavor) and on the puffing regime.
methodsCarbonyls were determined in the mainstream emissions of HTPs. Vapors from 5 commercial HTPs: IQOS, LIL, PULZE, ILUMA and GLO, and fifteen different stick flavors were generated using a peristaltic pump under both ISO and Canadian puffing regimes. Carbonyls were collected in an impinger containing a 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH) solution and analyzed using HPLC-UV.
resultsAll HTPs emit carbonyls. Acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde and butyraldehyde are detected in quantities varying from 34.35 to 72.11 μg/stick, 3.28 to 8.58 μg/stick and 3.07 to 6.20 μg/stick respectively, for the different brands and stick flavors. Formaldehyde and crotonaldehyde are found below the detection limit of the analytical method. Acetone and acrolein co-eluted and cannot be quantified. Under ISO regime, ILUMA emits more acetaldehyde than GLO, more propionaldehyde compared to the other brands and more butyraldehyde compared to PULZE, LIL and GLO. Under Canadian regime, no significant variations were found between the brands, except IQOS that emits more acetaldehyde than GLO. Also, the difference of the sticks, thus having a different flavor, within the same brand, has an impact on the emissions.
conclusionsAlthough HTPs are promoted as products with reduced risk compared to conventional cigarettes, still the detection of carbonyls in HTPs emissions is a fact and needs further research. All five HTPs used here and all sticks used emit carbonyls. Carbonyls' concentrations are found to vary significantly among the different brands, the difference of the sticks, and concerning flavor, and to increase when changing to a more intense puffing regime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.