ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Analysis of risk factors for PICC-related venous thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies and establishment of a nomogram prediction model.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the independent risk factors for PICC-related venous thrombosis in patients with hematologic malignancies, and to construct and validate a risk prediction model. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 264 hematologic malignancy patients who received PICC chemotherapy at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3), and the incidence of CRT was calculated. In the training set, LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression identified independent CRT risk factors, which were used to construct a predictive nomogram. The model's discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using AUC, calibration curves, and DCA. Results: The prevalence of PICC-related venous thrombosis was 6.1%, with 16 out of 264 patients diagnosed with CRT. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified seven independent risk factors for CRT: hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time, D-dimer, globulin, punctured vein, and catheter insertion depth. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the training and validation sets was 0.965 and 0.977, respectively. Calibration and decision curve analyses demonstrated that the nomogram had good predictive accuracy and clinical utility in estimating CRT risk in patients with hematologic malignancies. Conclusions: In this study, we identified independent risk factors for CRT following PICC placement in patients with hematologic malignancies and developed a predictive model to assess CRT risk. The model demonstrated good discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, enabling individualized risk assessment and intervention strategies to improve chemotherapy safety and extend PICC use duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.