ArticlePain reports2026
Optimum electrical sinusoidal frequency stimulation to activate C-nociceptors.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electrical sinusoidal stimulation has been shown to reliably activate C-fibers. Here, we explored the optimum sinusoidal frequency for C-nociceptor responses. Objectives: Identify the optimum sinusoidal frequency to activate single C-nociceptors in pigs and to provoke pain and axon reflex flare in humans. Methods: Single C-fibers (n = 60) were recorded from pig saphenous nerves in vivo in response to transcutaneous sinusoidal electrical stimulation delivered at frequencies of 3 to 100 Hz with increasing amplitudes. In 22 human subjects, 30 sinusoidal pulses were delivered with 3 to 20 Hz at 0.0125 to 0.4 mA amplitudes and perception thresholds, evoked pain (numeric rating scale, 0-10) and axon reflex flare (full-field laser perfusion imaging) were monitored in 4 seconds intervals. Results: Single C-nociceptors (36 "polymodal" [C-mechano-heat-sensitive], 15 "very high threshold, and 9 "silent" [C-mechano-insensitive]) were activated more easily at frequencies below 8 Hz as compared with frequencies >10 Hz. In humans, pain and flare responses were also found to be frequency dependent. Pain threshold assessments were particularly sensitive at a frequency of 4 Hz. Highest pain ratings were recorded from 3 to 6 Hz at stimulation amplitudes of 0.2 mA. Significant axon reflex flare responses developed at low amplitudes of 0.05 and 0.1 mA at frequencies of 4 and 8 Hz only. Conclusion: Sinusoidal frequencies between 3 and 8 Hz are better suited to activate C-nociceptors than stimuli above 10 Hz and are expected to facilitate C-nociceptor recruitment for their functional assessment in volunteers and chronic pain patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.