ArticlePain reports2026
The accuracy and reliability of patient-reported opioid consumption following surgical fracture management.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Patterns and Trajectory of Continued Opioid Use in Opioid-Naïve Patients After Curative-Intent Elective Cancer Surgery-A Prospective Cohort Study.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Postoperative opioid use is commonly determined by patient-report; however, the accuracy of this measure is unclear. We aimed to determine the accuracy and reliability of patient-reported daily opioid consumption up to day 7 and over weeks 1, 2, and 3 after hospital discharge. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a randomised trial which tested the comparative effectiveness of 2 opioid regimens. Participants' daily opioid consumption was recorded by patient self-report and the quantity of returned pills in blister packs during the treatment period. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots for repeated measures were used to assess the agreement between each collection method. Results: Records with complete patient-reported daily opioid consumption and returned blister packs were included in the analysis (81 of 120). For day 1 postdischarge, the ICC between patient-reported opioid consumption and consumption determined by blister-pack countback was 0.730. From days 2 to 7, the ICC was consistently greater than 0.8, and the mean difference was consistently less than half a tablet. For week 1 overall, the ICC was 0.904, and the mean difference was -0.4 tablets. For weeks 2 and weeks 3, the ICC was 0.953 and 0.884, respectively. Conclusion: Patient-reported consumption was a reliable and accurate measure of opioid consumption after hospital discharge. Daily consumption demonstrated less reliability and accuracy during the first 24 hours (day 1) which improved overtime. Although patients tended to under-report use, this difference was not seen as clinically meaningful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.