ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Aligning statistical models with inference goals in the neuroscience of language: A dual-dependency taxonomy.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Language unfolds over time and across multiple representational levels, from acoustics to meaning. Neural systems must, therefore, integrate temporal with representational structure, linking the evolving input with the hierarchical units it instantiates. These operations give rise to two fundamental statistical dependencies in linguistic and neural data: covariance, the instantaneous shared structure across features or recording sites, and temporal dependence, the influence of past states on the present state. As experiments become more naturalistic, neuroimaging and electrophysiological data increasingly express both forms of structure, producing correlated variables and continuous temporal dependencies that complicate interpretation. Because statistical models handle covariance and temporal dependence differently, they support distinct kinds of inference about language-brain mapping. We introduce a Dual-Dependency Taxonomy that classifies modeling approaches by the dependencies they represent. This framework clarifies the linguistic-neural relationships each model family can reveal, the questions they cannot address, and the methodological implications that follow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.