ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Shared neural representation between motor execution and kinesthetic imagery in the primary motor cortex.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although motor imagery activates higher-order motor-related areas, the role of the primary motor cortex (M1) in motor imagery remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether motor imagery recruits a neural representation of fingers similar to that of motor execution in the hand M1. Ten healthy right-handed adults executed and kinesthetically imagined tapping using one of four fingers. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with multi-voxel pattern analysis, we trained the decoder to classify which finger the participants were moving using brain activation during motor execution and tested whether it could predict which finger the participants were imaging to move during motor imagery (cross-classification). We also performed the classification in the reverse direction. The average accuracy of these cross-classifications (mean = 32.71%, SD = 8.31) was significantly higher than chance in the left hemisphere hand M1 (hand-M1). Analysis of the representational geometry showed that the distance of neural representations for the same fingers was statistically shorter than that for different fingers between motor execution and imagery. Furthermore, we conducted a replication study with 14 participants and found results similar to those of the original study (mean cross-classification accuracy = 37.5%, SD = 7.18). Our results suggest that the neural representation of kinesthetic motor imagery is partially similar, but not equivalent, to that of motor execution in the contralateral hand M1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.