ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Identifying high healthcare utilizers following cervical spine surgery using comprehensive predictive modeling techniques.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Healthcare expenditures among patients with chronic spinal conditions and those undergoing surgery continue to grow at a notable rate. Identifying patients at risk for increased postoperative healthcare utilization is therefore critical for optimizing care outcomes and resource allocation. The aim of our study is to leverage a range of preoperative patient characteristics - including comprehensive medical, surgical, and social histories - to develop machine learning (ML) models capable of granular prediction of postoperative healthcare utilization among cervical spine fusion patients. Materials and Methods: A cohort of anterior cervical decompression and fusion and posterior cervical decompression and fusion surgeries was queried from a tertiary academic medical center from 2002 to 2022. Patient and operative characteristics were systematically extracted. Several different ML algorithms were employed and optimized to predict high healthcare utilizers using an aggregate 90-day index. SHAP feature importance values were computed for the top-performing model. Results: A total of 4480 cervical fusion surgeries were analyzed, of which 12% were identified as high health utilizers. All models outperformed the American Society of Anesthesia benchmark, with the Balanced Random Forest model demonstrating the best discriminative performance (Area under the curve: 0.772 ± 0.007). The top-three predictive features revealed through SHAP analysis were increased OR duration, 90-day preoperative neuromodulator usage, and 90-day preoperative opioid usage. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the successful creation of a prognostic ML model for the prediction of high healthcare utilization within 90 days of cervical spine surgery. These models, after external validation, have the potential to be instrumental aspects of a spine surgeon's workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.