ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Teriparatide use in osteopenic patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion associated with decreased 2-year revision rates.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of Perioperative Teriparatide Use with Postoperative Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Low bone density is common among lumbar fusion patients and increases the risks of pseudarthrosis, hardware failure, and revision. Teriparatide improves bone mass and fusion in osteoporosis, but its benefit in osteopenia or normal bone remains uncertain. Aims: To evaluate the association between teriparatide exposure and (1) postoperative complications, (2) 90-day readmission, and (3) 2-year reoperation, stratified by bone health status (osteoporotic, osteopenic, and normal) in patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion. Setting and Design: A retrospective cohort study using the PearlDiver database from 2010 to 2021 identified patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion. Subjects and Methods: Patients on teriparatide were matched 1:5 to controls based on age, gender, obesity status, bisphosphonate use, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Patients were categorized by bone health status: Normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic. Outcomes included postoperative complications, 90-day readmissions, and 2-year revision rates. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regressions were used for analysis, with statistical significance set at Results: The analysis included 3527 teriparatide users and 17,576 controls. Teriparatide use was associated with significantly lower 90-day readmission and 2-year revision rates in osteopenic and normal bone health patients compared to osteoporotic patients. However, osteopenic patients on teriparatide experienced higher rates of deep vein thrombosis (1.8% vs. 0.4%, Conclusions: Among osteopenic patients, teriparatide was linked to fewer 2-year revisions but higher 90-day thromboembolic events. These findings support nuanced risk-benefit discussions and highlight the need for trials clarifying indications across bone-health categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.