ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Spinal brucellosis - A mimicker of spinal tuberculosis: An analysis of 10 patients from a tertiary care center in India.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Brucellosis of the spine has emerged as a significant health concern in developing countries. Spinal brucellosis shares identical clinical and radiological features with tubercular spondylodiscitis. A wide range of nonspecific symptoms, chronicity of this disease, and tissue culture which is mostly invasive and time-consuming, pose a challenge in definitive diagnosis. In this study, we aim to report the clinical, radiological, and microbiological features of this disease and analyze the outcome of patients treated for spinal brucellosis. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted from 2018 to 2022 on confirmed cases of brucellosis of the spine who had adequate follow-up of at least 2 years after completion of treatment. Results: In this retrospective analysis, 10 patients had spinal brucellosis. All of them had presented with chronic history of low back pain for a period of 3-6 months. Occupational exposure was present in six patients (60%). Five (50%) of them underwent surgical intervention due to failed/doubtful diagnosis. Except for one patient, microbiological evidence of the infection was seen within 10 days from the tissue biopsy. All patients were treated with a triple regimen (gentamycin, doxycycline, and rifampin) for a period of 3 months as per World Health Organization protocol. All patients were healed of the disease with good functional outcome. Conclusion: Culture, either blood or tissue, is the gold standard method for diagnosis of this zoonotic disease. Only 50% of the study patients underwent surgical debridement. All patients in the study had good outcome with 3 months of antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.