ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Determinants of surgical outcome in spinal tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis of 84 patients.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal tuberculosis (STB) is a major cause of spinal deformity, instability, and neurological deficits. While antitubercular therapy (ATT) is the primary treatment, surgery is indicated in advanced disease or complications. This study evaluates surgical management and outcomes in cervical, thoracic, and thoracolumbar STB at a single Indian center. Methodology: Retrospective review of 84 patients (cervical 17, thoracic 37, thoracolumbar 14, and lumbar 16) who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2023. Data included demographics, clinical presentation, neurological status (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] scale), pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), surgical approach, fusion technique, complications, and postoperative outcomes. Surgical strategy was individualized based on lesion location, vertebral involvement, and deformity. Results: Mean age ranged from 36.5 (cervical) to 49.3 (lumbar) years; males predominated. Pain (90%), fever (80%), and fatigue (66%) were common; neurological deficits occurred in 51%. Anterior approaches were used in cervical (76%) and thoracic (59%) cases, posterior in thoracolumbar (86%) and lumbar (100%), with combined anterior-posterior in 4%. Operative time and blood loss were lowest for cervical (96 ± 15 min; 70 ± 23 mL) and highest for thoracolumbar cases (156 ± 40 min; 264 ± 81 mL). Postoperatively, most patients improved neurologically (ASIA D/E), with significant pain reduction (VAS 7.1-7.6 → 2.2-2.9) and functional recovery (ODI 49-63 → 19-27). Complications were infrequent and manageable. Conclusion: Tailored surgical intervention for STB, guided by anatomical site and disease severity, achieves excellent neurological, functional, and radiological outcomes. Early, appropriately planned surgery remains essential for patients with progressive deficits, instability, or inadequate response to ATT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.