ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Surgical management of gunshot-induced spinal cord injuries: A case series analysis.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Design: Retrospective observational study of patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) caused by civilian gunshot wounds (GSW) surgically treated at a tertiary hospital between 2017 and 2024. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate surgical indications, techniques, complications, and neurological outcomes in CGWSCI and assess the role of surgery in this setting. Overview of Literature: Gunshot injuries represent up to 17% of spinal cord trauma, mainly affecting young men. Civilian lesions differ from military due to reduced projectile velocity and cavitation effects. Literature shows that prognosis depends primarily on initial American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) grade, while the neurological benefit of surgery remains controversial and potentially overestimated. Materials and Methods: Medical records of 24 patients were reviewed. Data included demographics, level of injury, projectile location, neurological status (ASIA scale), surgical procedure, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, repair technique, complications, and neurological outcome. Statistical analysis employed Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests, with significance at Results: Patients were mostly male (87.5%), mean age 29.7 years. Thoracic lesions predominated (58.3%). Projectiles were intracanal in 50% and fragments in 33.3%. At admission, 70.8% were ASIA A, and 29.2% had incomplete deficits. Neurological improvement occurred in 16.7%, exclusively in incomplete injuries, with a significant association between initial ASIA and recovery ( Conclusions: CGWSCI predominantly affect young men and often results in complete deficits, with limited potential for neurological recovery. Surgery did not benefit ASIA A patients but may aid selected cases with incomplete deficits, neural compression, instability, or CSF fistula. Initial ASIA grade remains the strongest prognostic factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.