ReviewJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
The omohyoid muscle in anterior cervical approaches: Forgotten anatomy with surgical and functional implications.
Review in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retraction: The omohyoid muscle in anterior cervical approaches: Forgotten anatomy with surgical and functional implications.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The omohyoid muscle is frequently encountered during anterior cervical spine surgery, particularly at the C5-C7 levels, yet it has received limited emphasis in spinal literature. Its superior belly often crosses the operative corridor, leading surgeons to choose between preservation, retraction, or sectioning. This narrative review synthesizes anatomical and clinical evidence regarding omohyoid variability, surgical handling, and postoperative outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures. Anatomical studies reveal substantial muscle variation, including accessory slips and aberrant insertions, which can influence exposure. Emerging clinical data suggest that sectioning the superior belly when obstructive improves visualization and may reduce operative time and blood loss without significantly increasing dysphagia, dysphonia, or cosmetic concerns. However, prospective studies with standardized outcome measures remain limited. Understanding this "forgotten anatomy" may enhance operative planning, optimize exposure, and refine technique in lower cervical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.