ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2026
Reproductive Outcome After Laparoscopic Ovarian Endometrioma Stripping With Volumetric Hydrodissection.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reproductive Outcome After Laparoscopic Ovarian Endometrioma Stripping With Volumetric Hydrodissection.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hydrodissection (HD) is used in surgical blunt dissection covering its two types. The first one is volumetric with application of neutral fluids to obtain exclusive separation of tissue planes. The second one is hybrid with additional effect by addition of some pharmaceutics like vasoconstrictors to neutral fluid. In most reports dealing with ovarian endometrioma stripping, the hybrid HD is used. Aim of the Work: To assess application of volumetric HD in endometrioma stripping in respect to intraoperative and postoperative data including reproductive outcome. Materials and Methods: The prospective observational study was conducted in a group of 53 women qualified for laparoscopic enucleation of endometrial cysts. The patients were operated with two methods according to surgeon choice. First method was the enucleation proceeded by volumetric HD, and in the other one, classic stripping was performed. The patients operated with these methods constituted two groups accordingly. All the patients were asked to fulfill the questionnaires dealing with their reproductive data. Results: Volumetric HD was not found to reduce surgery time, to diminish the frequency of ovarian stitching, and to reduce postoperative pain. Decrease in the AMH was lower in Group I, but it did not reach statistical significance ( Conclusions: There are some positive postoperative changes after application of volumetric HD in endometrioma stripping, but it did not cause better reproduction outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.