ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2026
Deep learning to predict future cognitive decline: a multimodal approach using brain MRI and clinical data.
Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying generalization error in machine learning prediction of cognitive decline.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- When does more data help? Spectral Geometry and Scaling Laws in MRI Transformers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predicting Autopsy-Confirmed Neuropathology across Clinical, Neuroimaging, and CSF Biomarkers using Machine Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the trajectory of clinical decline in aging individuals is a pressing challenge, especially for people with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or vascular dementia. Accurate predictions can guide treatment decisions, identify risk factors, and optimize clinical trials. In this study, we compared two deep learning approaches for forecasting changes, over a 2-year interval, in the Clinical Dementia Rating scale 'sum of boxes' score (sobCDR), as a continuous outcome (regression). This is a key metric in dementia research and clinical trials, and scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 18 (severe impairment). To predict decline, we trained a hybrid convolutional neural network (CNN) that integrates 3D T1-weighted brain MRI scans with tabular clinical and demographic features (including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and baseline sobCDR). We benchmarked its performance against AutoGluon, an automated multimodal machine learning framework that selects an appropriate neural network architecture (an 'autoML' approach). We evaluated the models using data from 2,319 unique participants drawn from three independent cohorts-ADNI, OASIS-3, and NACC. For each participant, we used one T1-weighted brain MRI scan along with corresponding clinical and demographic information. Our results demonstrate the importance of combining image and tabular data in predictive modeling for this clinical application. Deep learning algorithms can fuse information from image-based brain signatures and tabular clinical data, with potential for personalized prognostics in aging and dementia. Rather than concluding that multimodal fusion uniformly improves performance, our results show that deep learning applied to volumetric MRI data may struggle to add predictive value, particularly when clinical covariates explain substantial variance and provide a strong baseline. In other conditions and tasks, it may help to have a hybrid system that can learn from both data types, and their relative value may be different. Conversely, AutoML-based multimodal fusion provides a robust baseline when tabular data already provide strong predictive value for the task. These insights clarify how different multimodal strategies could be selected in clinical prognostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.