ArticleCureus2026
Speed and Accuracy of a Stepping-Over Motion in Older Women Under Dual-Task Conditions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder women experience higher fall rates and are more susceptible to severe injuries than men. Therefore, fall-prevention programs should be specifically tailored for women.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the dual-task switching cost in older women and to clarify their association with the speed and accuracy of the crossing motion. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional design. A total of 20 older women (74.5 ± 1.7 years) and 20 younger women (21.5 ± 0.5 years) participated in this experiment. The crossing motion was measured using a 3D motion analysis system under four conditions: (1) lateral without a cognitive task, (2) lateral with a cognitive task, (3) backward without a cognitive task, and (4) backward with cognitive task. Under each condition, participants were instructed to step over as quickly as possible in response to a visual cue. Each participant performed the motion 10 times per condition and was instructed to maintain consistent movements. The foot trajectory, variability of landed position, reaction time, and crossing time during the swing phase were calculated and compared between older and younger adults.
resultsCompared with the younger group, the older group showed a significantly longer reaction time during the cognitive task (p < 0.05). However, motion consistency and crossing time were comparable between the groups.
conclusionShorten reaction time is essential for performing quick and accurate stepping movements, which are necessary for effective fall prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.