ArticleCureus2026
Draf III Procedure Using Multiple Pedicled Mucosal Flaps for Refractory Frontal Sinusitis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Draf III procedure may serve as a surgical option for patients with frontal sinusitis that is refractory to standard treatment or prone to recurrence. However, postoperative restenosis caused by neo-osteogenesis and granulation tissue formation remains a major clinical problem. Coverage of exposed bone using mucosal grafts or pedicled flaps has been advocated to prevent restenosis, but adequate flap reconstruction may be difficult in revision cases with marked bony overgrowth. We report a case of a 62-year-old woman with refractory frontal sinusitis associated with IgG4-related disease and extensive neo-osteogenesis. The patient had undergone multiple prior endoscopic sinus surgeries, resulting in the loss of normal anatomical landmarks and progressive frontal sinus obstruction despite medical therapy, including biological therapy. A Draf III procedure was then performed. Given the extensive bone exposure and anatomical limitations, reconstruction was achieved using a combination of multiple mucosal flaps, including a superior lateral anterior pedicle flap, a septoturbinal flap, a Hadad-Bassagasteguy flap, and free mucosal grafts. Postoperatively, frontal sinus patency was maintained, and the patient's frontal headache resolved without the need for analgesics at the six-month follow-up. In refractory frontal sinusitis with marked bony overgrowth and a high risk of restenosis, particularly in revision cases, reconstruction using a combination of multiple mucosal flaps tailored to the remaining anatomy may be crucial for maintaining frontal sinus patency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.