ArticleCureus2026
Postmortem Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Potential Marker for Prostatic Disease: A Forensic Exploratory Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in new ultrasound technologies in targeted prostate biopsy (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProstate-specific antigen (PSA) is widely used clinically to diagnose and monitor prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although PSA has long been used in forensic science for semen identification, its utility as a postmortem serum biomarker has not been systematically evaluated in a forensic autopsy context. This study explored whether postmortem serum PSA levels may reflect underlying prostatic pathology in forensic autopsy practice.
methodsA total of 101 male autopsy cases (PCa, n = 3; BPH, n = 16; non-prostatic malignancies, n = 36; controls, n = 46) examined between 2015 and 2024 were included. Postmortem cardiac blood was collected, and serum PSA levels were measured using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays. Group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc analysis, and relationships between PSA levels, age, and postmortem interval (PMI) were examined using simple linear regression.
resultsMedian PSA levels were 0.87 ng/mL in controls, 234.0 ng/mL in PCa, and 3.82 ng/mL in BPH, while PSA levels in non-prostatic malignancies were comparable to controls. Markedly elevated PSA values were observed in PCa cases compared with controls; however, all PCa-related findings were interpreted strictly as exploratory owing to the extremely small number of PCa cases (n = 3). In the BPH group, the PSA values showed only a modest tendency toward elevation relative to controls, with substantial overlap between groups. PSA levels in controls showed no significant correlation with age or PMI.
conclusionPostmortem serum PSA may serve as a supportive adjunctive indicator of underlying prostatic pathology in forensic autopsies; however, its diagnostic performance - particularly for distinguishing benign disease from normal aging - appears limited. These findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger multicenter cohorts. The primary objective was to explore whether postmortem serum PSA differs among PCa, BPH, and control cases, and the secondary objectives were to examine its relationships with age and PMI and the postmortem stability of PSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.