Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717141›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Resilience, Mental Toughness, and Physical Activity Levels: A Survey of Doctors From Different Generations and Specialities.

Ryan S Ting, Siew-Piau Tan, Michael J Symes, Geoffrey C S Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan S TingFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AUS.
Siew-Piau TanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, St George and Sutherland Hospitals, Sydney, AUS.
Michael J SymesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, St George and Sutherland Hospitals, Sydney, AUS.
Geoffrey C S SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, St George and Sutherland Hospitals, Sydney, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background How mental and physical attributes differ between doctors of different generations and specialities is undetermined. We aimed to compare how resilience, mental toughness, physical activity levels, and career satisfaction vary between medical professionals of different generations, specialities, career stages, practice settings, and genders. Methodology This was an electronic survey study that compared the Brief Resilience Score (maximum six points), Mental Toughness Index (maximum 56 points), International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, and career satisfaction (0-100 scale) between doctors and medical students at two affiliated teaching hospitals. All data are presented as median (interquartile range). Results In total, 289 medics responded. Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964) (4.2 (3.7, 4.8)) were more resilient than Generation Z (born 1997-2012) (3.8 (3.2, 4.0), p=0.0007), Millennials (born 1981-1996) (3.8 (3.3, 4.2), p=0.0091), and Generation X (born 1965-1980) (4.0 (3.5, 4.2), p = 0.0354). Generation Z (42 (39, 46)) were less mentally tough than Millennials (44 (41, 47), p=0.0330), Generation X (46 (41, 48), p=0.0062), and Baby Boomers (46 (43, 52), p=0.0005). Millennials were less mentally tough than Baby Boomers (p=0.0199). Generation Z were more physically active than Generation X (1,822 (1,052, 3,662) vs. 1,542 (777, 2,586), p=0.0383). Generation Z had lower career satisfaction than Millennials (73 (58, 80) vs. 80 (70, 89), p=0.0094), Generation X (85 (75, 90), p<0.0001), and Baby Boomers (90 (85, 94), p<0.0001). Millennials had lower career satisfaction than Generation X (p=0.0291) and Baby Boomers (p=0.0014), respectively. Medical students were less resilient than consultants(3.7 (3.2, 4.0) vs. 4.0 (3.5, 4.2), p=0.0193). Medical students (41 (38, 47)) and interns (42 (38, 45)) had lower mental toughness than both senior trainees (46.0 (41, 49), p=0.0096 and p=0.0022, respectively) and consultants (46 (41, 48), p=0.0022 and p=0.0005, respectively). Medical students (2,224 (1,370, 4,760) had higher physical activity levels (as defined by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form score) than junior trainees (1,386 (731, 2,656), p=0.0038), senior trainees (1,395 (1,065, 3,034), p=0.0327), and consultants (1,533 (820, 2,546), p=0.0017). Career satisfaction increased with career stage (Spearman's (r=0.3219, 95% CI=0.2075-0.4277, p<0.001). Physician trainees were more satisfied with their careers (as per self-rated 0-100 satisfaction scale) than trainees of "other" (non-physician/non-surgical) specialities (80 (72, 90) vs. 75 (40, 80), p=0.0090). Consultant surgeons (4.2 (4.0, 4.5) and 48 (46, 53)) were more resilient and mentally tougher than consultant physicians (3.8 (3.3, 4.0) and 44 (39, 48), p=0.0002 and p=0.0003, respectively) and consultants of other specialities (3.8 (3.3, 4.2) and 44 (41, 47), p=0.0004 and p<0.0001, respectively). Consultants who worked in both private and public hospitals had greater mental toughness (47 (43, 51) vs. 44 (41, 47), p=0.0153) and career satisfaction (86 (80, 90) vs. 80 (70, 90), p=0.0053) than consultants who worked exclusively in public hospitals. Conclusions The present study found that self-reported resilience and mental toughness were the greatest among the Baby Boomers, and declined with subsequent generations. Among consultants, surgeons had the highest resilience and mental toughness scores. Career satisfaction increased with career stage.

Indexed as

career satisfactiongenerationmedicalmental toughnessphysical activityresiliencespecialtysurvey

Identifiers

PMID41717141
PMCPMC12914746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.