ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Spatiotemporal dynamics of rhizosphere microbial communities under different mulching methods in spring maize.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Plastic film mulching is a critical practice in arid agroecosystems, yet its spatiotemporal impacts on the rhizosphere microbiome remain poorly understood. Methods: Here, we investigated how no-mulching (CK), on-film hole sowing (UPM), and film-side planting (FPM) shape the bacterial and fungal communities in the maize rhizosphere across developmental stages (V12 and R6) and soil depths (10, 20, and 30 cm). Results: Concurrently, both mulching strategies increased maize yield relative to CK, with FPM ultimately outperforming UPM (19.05% vs. 6.24%). Amplicon sequencing showed that mulching strongly structured the rhizosphere microbiome with clear spatiotemporal variation. Bacterial and fungal communities exhibited contrasting patterns: bacteria responded mainly in topsoil at V12 and across all depths by R6, whereas fungi responded across the soil profile at V12, with responses weakening with depth at R6. Mulching-particularly UPM-reduced key taxa, including the nitrifying genus Discussion: Although microbial shifts were correlated with yield components, yield increases were likely dominated by the direct physical effects of mulching. Overall, distinct mulching strategies generated divergent rhizosphere trajectories, with FPM potentially offering a more sustainable option for dryland maize production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.