ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Superior machine learning model for post-cardiac arrest mortality prediction: a MIMIC-IV cohort study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between early body temperature dynamic trajectory and mortality and infection rates for patients with cardiac arrest in ICU: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Systemic inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, SII, PNI and FPR) combined with CEA for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasms: development and temporal validation of a machine learning model.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-cardiac arrest syndrome carries substantial mortality despite advances in resuscitation. We developed a machine learning model to predict 28-day mortality using comprehensive clinical data. Methods: We analyzed data from 1122 cardiac arrest patients in the MIMIC-IV database. After applying exclusion criteria, 853 patients with complete 28-day outcome data were included. We extracted 99 variables across six domains and compared five machine learning algorithms. Lactate clearance was calculated as: (Day 1 lactate - Day 3 lactate)/Day 1 lactate × 100%. Model performance was evaluated using AUC-ROC, calibration metrics, and SHAP analysis. Results: Among 853 patients (mean age 64.7 ± 16.3 years, 63.5% male), 327 (38.3%) died within 28 days. The XGBoost model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92), outperforming APACHE III (AUC: 0.73). Lactate clearance rate emerged as the primary predictor (SHAP value: 0.24), followed by GCS score (0.21), SOFA score (0.18), age (0.16), and treatment intensity (0.14). Poor lactate clearance (0-25%) was associated with 67% mortality compared to 39% in moderate clearance (25-50%). Conclusions: Our machine learning model demonstrated superior accuracy for 28-day mortality prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients. Dynamic lactate clearance and neurological assessment provide actionable clinical insights for risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.