Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717038›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Superior machine learning model for post-cardiac arrest mortality prediction: a MIMIC-IV cohort study.

Danxia Chen, Guode Li, Qinqin Shu, Junlin Huang, Weifeng Yuan, Yan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danxia ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200434, China.
Guode LiDepartment of Cardiology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Qinqin ShuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200434, China.
Junlin HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Weifeng YuanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200434, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200434, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-cardiac arrest syndrome carries substantial mortality despite advances in resuscitation. We developed a machine learning model to predict 28-day mortality using comprehensive clinical data. Methods: We analyzed data from 1122 cardiac arrest patients in the MIMIC-IV database. After applying exclusion criteria, 853 patients with complete 28-day outcome data were included. We extracted 99 variables across six domains and compared five machine learning algorithms. Lactate clearance was calculated as: (Day 1 lactate - Day 3 lactate)/Day 1 lactate × 100%. Model performance was evaluated using AUC-ROC, calibration metrics, and SHAP analysis. Results: Among 853 patients (mean age 64.7 ± 16.3 years, 63.5% male), 327 (38.3%) died within 28 days. The XGBoost model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92), outperforming APACHE III (AUC: 0.73). Lactate clearance rate emerged as the primary predictor (SHAP value: 0.24), followed by GCS score (0.21), SOFA score (0.18), age (0.16), and treatment intensity (0.14). Poor lactate clearance (0-25%) was associated with 67% mortality compared to 39% in moderate clearance (25-50%). Conclusions: Our machine learning model demonstrated superior accuracy for 28-day mortality prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients. Dynamic lactate clearance and neurological assessment provide actionable clinical insights for risk stratification.

Indexed as

Lactate clearanceMachine learningMortality predictionPost-cardiac arrest syndromeSOFA score

Identifiers

PMID41717038
PMCPMC12914397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.