Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41717016›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Mathematical analysis of G1/S sub-networks in hematopoietic proliferation: Sequential and lineage-specific activation.

Andrea Hanel, Aya Abdelsalam, Sylvain Tollis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea HanelInstitute of Biomedicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70210 Kuopio, Finland.
Aya AbdelsalamDepartment of Technical Physics, Faculty of Science, Forestry and Technology, University of Eastern Finland, 70210 Kuopio, Finland.
Sylvain TollisQuantitative Cell Biology (QCB) Consulting, 63270 Manglieu, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commitment to the cell division cycle constrains other fate choices at the single-cell level. Hence the molecular network controlling the G1/S transition must be coordinated with developmental phases. Healthy hematopoiesis relies on shifts in cell cycle dynamics that balance proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells and lineage progenitors, offering an ideal model system to study this coordination. Using computational analysis of published single-cell transcriptomics profiles of human bone marrow and mathematical modeling, we demonstrate that variations in the expression of cyclin D- and cyclin E-centered sub-modules of the G1/S network carve out distinct trajectories from G1 to S, explaining the distinct proliferation properties of hematopoietic cell types evolving in the same microenvironment. We map 68 hematopoietic cell types to specific model parameters, and identify their individual route through G1/S. This theoretical work provides mechanistic insight into hematopoietic proliferation that could guide experimental testing and the design of more nuanced cell cycle-targeting pharmacological strategies.

Indexed as

cell biologymathematical biosciencessystems biology

Identifiers

PMID41717016
PMCPMC12915230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.