ArticleiScience2026
Explainable transformer framework for fast cotton leaf diagnostics and fabric defect detection.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated design of an efficient multi spectral imaging and federated learning framework for precision crop disease diagnosis in low-resource farming communities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Domain-robust vision transformer with hierarchical swin encoding for explainable low-latency driver drowsiness detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Explainable AI-driven hybrid deep learning framework for accurate skin cancer diagnosis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a hybrid deep learning model that combines CNN-based hierarchical feature extraction with light-efficient vision transformer self-attention to classify multiple types of cotton leaf diseases and fabric defects. Using Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, the framework enhances interpretability, allowing domain experts to better understand the model's decisions. Evaluated on four benchmark datasets, the proposed XCottL-FebViT achieved consistent improvements in accuracy, MCC, and F1 Score compared with leading transformer-based models, while maintaining computational efficiency through hyperparameter optimization. For CottonLeafNet and SAR-CLD, it attained training accuracies of 99.97% and 99.95%, with validation accuracies of 99.93% and 99.91%, respectively. In fabric defect classification, the model achieved 99.97% training accuracy on CottonFabricImageBD and FabricSpotDefect, with validation accuracies of 99.93% and 99.95%, respectively. A lightweight web-based application enables practical deployment for remote disease and defect detection. This work highlights the integration of interpretability, efficiency, and high performance in AI-driven agricultural and textile quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.