Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716969›Full record

ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2026

Dental patients' views on oral health and hygiene: a questionnaire-based assessment in Bangladesh.

Majedul Hoque, Md Aktaruzzaman, Md Nahid Hasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Majedul HoqueDepartment of Pharmacy, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md AktaruzzamanDepartment of Pharmacy, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Nahid HasanDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Toledo, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A major influence on quality of life is caused by the general public's inability to recognize poor oral health and untreated oral disorders, as well as the widespread acceptance of poor oral status as the standard. Because they are so common and often ignored, oral diseases pose an existential risk to public health. People's attitudes regarding oral health and illness, therefore, have a significant impact on dental health. This study aims to assess the patients' behavior, attitudes, and level of knowledge while visiting or seeking dental treatment at various dental care clinics in Kishoreganj, Bangladesh. Methods: A structured self-chosen questionnaire, that takes 5-10 minutes to complete, was posed to general patients visiting dental care. The individuals' responses were computed as percentages. Results: Among the 214 participants, 67% brush their teeth two times daily. About 72% patients change their toothbrush following 2 months of usage and 6% patients change it within 6 months. Among the patients 44% stated primary information source about dental health is their parents. Majority patients 84% know that oral health have influence over general well-being of our life and the practice of cleaning mouth and making gurgle after eating food is prevalent among participants by just below 50%. Conclusion: The study participants' attitudes, practice and awareness of their dental health are reasonable, but they fall short of what is needed. Consequently, it is essential to offer instruction and encouragement regarding oral health and associated challenges.

Indexed as

awarenessoral healthoral hygienetoothbrush

Identifiers

PMID41716969
PMCPMC12914372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.