ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
Outcomes of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Penile Cancer.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in patients with penile cancer treated over 14 years. Methods and Materials: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy from January 2010 to December 2022 were included, with follow-up continuing until December 2023. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), with additional analyses of toxicity and recurrence patterns. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the associations between clinical variables and outcomes (OS and RFS). Hazard ratios with 95% CIs were calculated, and a Results: A total of 30 patients met the selection criteria. The median age was 57 years (IQR, 52-63), with a median follow-up of 84 months (95% CI, 74.02-92.81 months). The median OS was 77.2 months, while the median RFS was not reached. Five-year and 7-year survival rates were 52% and 46%, respectively. The 5-year RFS was 66%. Among 8 patients with recurrence, 6 had locoregional and 2 had distant metastasis. RT was generally well tolerated, with lymphedema as the most common side effect. Conclusions: Despite adjuvant RT, survival outcomes remain suboptimal, with high rates of locoregional relapse. These findings underscore the need for improved treatment strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.