ArticleFrontiers in insect science2026
Comparative volatile profiling of mango (
Article in Frontiers in insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The volatiles from Mango tree play a critical role in mediating interactions with herbivores, including the mango pulp weevil ( Methods: In this study, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from different mango tree parts viz., young flush, mature flush, stem, flower, stone, whole and sliced green fruits, whole and sliced ripened fruits were characterized through solvent extraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). The behavioural responses of adults were evaluated through Y-tube olfactometer assays. Results and discussion: Ripened mango fruits, young leaves and mango stone elicited the strongest responses and were further subjected to headspace volatile collection. Ripened fruit volatiles induced the highest levels of attraction (63.33%), activity (86.67%) and preference (46.15%). Young leaf volatiles induced moderate attraction (46.7%) with high activity (83.3% but low preference (12%). Mango stone volatiles, in contrast, evoked minimal activity (6.7%) and preference (10%). GC-MS profiling of headspace extracts revealed nine compounds each from ripened fruits and young leaves and seven from stones, with D-limonene, 3-carene and α-pinene dominating across all treatments. These findings highlight key VOCs associated with host selection by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.